// HOW WE COMPARE

BETTER THANTHE ALTERNATIVES.

01// THE COMPARISON

CONTINUOUS VS.
PERIODIC.

Hiring a security engineer, signing with an MSSP, or engaging a vCISO all share the same problem. They are slow, expensive, and built around periodic reviews rather than continuous protection.

Threat Unknown runs continuously. Findings are always current and remediations happen in days, not quarters.

02// FEATURE COMPARISON
THREAT UNKNOWN
HIRING AN ENGINEER
MSSP
vCISO
Automated Scanning
Continuous, real-time
Manual or ad hoc
Periodic (quarterly)
None
Personalised Roadmap
AI-generated, always current
Depends on engineer
Generic templates
Manual, slow to update
Auto-Remediation
Agents write and execute the fix, on your approval
Manual implementation
Alert only, no fixes
Advises, doesn't implement
Available Immediately
Same week
3 to 6 month hire cycle
4 to 8 week onboarding
2 to 4 week onboarding
Cost
Startup-accessible
$180k to $250k per year
$60k to $120k per year
$80k to $150k per year
How It Scales
With your stack
With hours in the day
Renegotiate contract
Hire more vCISOs
03// THE BOTTOM LINE
Hire an engineer and wait months before they are up to speed. Or get started today at a fraction of the cost.
Same-week deploymentContinuous, not quarterlyStartup-accessible pricing
04// BY THE NUMBERS
10 min
Time to first findings
24/7
Continuous monitoring
Days
From finding to fix, not quarters
4×
more confirmed breaches at small and mid-sized businesses than at large ones. Ransomware featured in 88% of them. Verizon 2025 DBIR SMB Snapshot.
Get Started →

BIG-TECH SECURITY.
STARTUP BUDGET.

No long-term contract. Setup in one session.Book a Demo →